Last of the color tests. This one is from http://www.testcolor.com/ This test is OFFICIAL. Know how I can tell? It has PIE CHARTS and came in an ugly sans serif font, thus it must be written by GEN-U-WINE SCIENTISTS. Also, you will note a smattering of poly-syllabic words.  Unfortunately, I cannot get the pie charts to show up here.

Result of your test :
Your results present a correlation ratio with our model superior to 89 % .
( In a general way, a result can be taken into account if this ratio is superior to 30 %.)
You are 53 % extrovert and 47 % introvert.
Independently of any order of importance :

You are charismatic and good in communication, you know how to attract and manage people.

You are also a manager and a structured person, you know how to take into account the needs of each person while leading them towards the set goals.

Finally you are able to have an in-depth thinking, you think before acting, and you know how to communicate your knowledge.
I mostly agree but I am not so sure about the "think before acting" phrase. Maybe that IS true.

Your understanding of your environment :
At first, at 37%, you are centered on your thoughts and your actions are determined by your knowledge and your experience.
Maybe that IS true for EVERYone.

Then, at a ratio of 32%, you are attached to moral values and feelings, and you have an emotional relation with the environment.
That IS true. The sight of the mountains and the tees around me is so uplifting, I can not imagine living anywhere else.
Finally, at 29%, you are focused on the facts and on the reality, and your decisions are determined by your perception of facts.
Are there any people anywhere whose decisions are not based on their perception of the facts? I guess I will have to agree with this statement despite its potentially broad application.

How you assert yourself :
In your relations with others, the dialogue and exchange of views with others influence your own ideas and points of view at 55%. Your knowledge, your personal learning and your preset convictions interfere in your decision-making at 44%.
Hmmm. I think I am influenced less by others than 44%, but what do I know--I am not a scientist.

Also, the bonds that you created with your family and friends represent 58% of your core emotions. Your creativity, your openness and your need to open up to renewal in your life have also an impact of 41%.

What on earth does that mean?

Finally, your actions and behaviour are determined by your sensibility and that of your partner at a ratio of 58%. Then you are driven at 41% by own will and personal goals.
Well, I guess that is broad enough to be true.

The qualities that characterize your personality at this time :

21% Your contact abilities. you are open and good communicator, you know how to attract people and engage them.
Maybe that IS true but I really do not like to be with groups of people. I enjoyed it while teaching as long as the groups were my students or very, very small groups of teachers.
20 %Your leadership. you are a manager and a leader, and you know how to organize groups of people and how to give them your energy.
When I want to.
20 % Your dynamism.  you are dynamic and active, you are determined in your actions, you know how to communicate your ideals and your energy, and thus, you know how to boost people.
Maybe that IS true, yes, when teaching.
19 % Your management skills. you are a manager and a structured person, you know how to take into account the needs of each person while leading them to the fixed goals.
Yes, this is true also. Maybe this little test IS scientific.
 18 % Your insights. you are a manager and a structured person, you know how to take into account the needs of each person while leading them to the fixed goals.
 --WAIT, what? Isn't that what I just read?
Finally, you are attuned to others and you show a good emotional intelligence, which allow you to give support to people, You are intellectual and intelligent, you wonder and you inquire before taking any action and setting your values.
Does this seem right to you? Or is it sufficiently general, yet positive? Or does it really just sum up everything? Were your results similar?

No comments: